The Middle East continues to struggle with instability largely because its leaders are unwilling or unable to implement the basic elements of governance. Lack of political will and state-sector reforms are some of the reasons for the region’s problems. The region’s leaders are failing to address basic freedoms, including the right to assembly and expression. Many of these states have also failed to respond effectively to the political upheavals of 2011. Saudi Arabia is one of the few states in the region to have attempted to institute a national reform program.
In 2002, the Arab leadership world reaffirmed that it would pursue a fair peace with Israel. But the two-state solution remains elusive because the Palestinian leadership has become divided and cannot make a convincing case for it. A unified Palestinian option would improve the credibility of the two-state solution and prevent Israeli hardliners from creating new facts on the ground. This is largely due to the lack of Arab leadership. The emergence of a unified Palestinian option could reverse this trend, but the prospects for it are slim.
It is important to note that despite the lack of unity among Arab nations, there is much that can be done to improve their relationship with the US. In terms of trade, the three countries have extensive potential to cooperate with each other and have many common interests. However, a growing trilateral alignment can be beneficial for the region, as it would reduce reliance on the Gulf States. Moreover, these countries can endear themselves to the US by implementing trade deals and building up military capability.
The Middle East has been torn between two visions of progress. One vision seeks to replace autocratic regimes with democratic movements. This vision is in the ascendant, but is likely to crash in the future because of its internal contradictions. The Arab publics are ambivalent about democracy, but they still retain considerable democratic potential. A democratization-led transition will help the region move toward a more peaceful and prosperous future.
The United States and other Western powers have historically supported reforms of Arab regimes. They did not want to uproot pliant regimes, which they considered essential to their interests. But they were afraid that the change would be a radical Islamist takeover. And so, in the end, the Arabs grew impatient with the promised transition. It was not until the mid-1990s that Western powers recognized that this kind of behavior was unacceptable and sought to change it.
Since the uprisings of 2011, the relationship between Arab leaders and their citizens has changed. While the initial euphoria of the democratic spring faded, underlying anger and frustration has persisted. Arab citizens have grown increasingly impatient with their governments, believing that they are corrupt, ineffective, and unaccountable. This resentment drives citizens to seek alternative paths.
While Obama was sympathetic to the Arab world and thoughtful about the issues in the region, he was unwilling to align with democratic forces. That was a major flaw in U.S. foreign policy. However, in the end, he had to accept the reality and step down. A more proactive approach is needed. The United States should continue to seek Arab leadership in these areas. In addition to supporting the development of their economies, the U.S. should maintain water security in the region.
The Palestinian issue has not been the primary cause of instability in the MENA region. Instead, the region has been plagued by the threat of religious extremism, which has proven far more divisive and destabilizing. In addition, the United States’ changed posture in the region and the nuclear deal with Iran have fueled instability and civil war. Ultimately, these factors have created a climate in which the Middle East has deteriorated.
Although the Saudis have made strides in countering Iranian influence, the results have been mixed. The prospects for success are not high. Both Iran and Saudi Arabia must seek a new modus vivendi. If they fail to do so, the region will continue to suffer as a result. It is imperative for Saudi Arabia to step up its efforts to build a strong regional leadership. However, it remains to be seen whether the Saudis and Iran can reconcile their differences in the Middle East.
Arab Leadership Has a Unique Perspective
The Arab world has seen its share of turmoil and political instability in recent years. However, there are some positives as well. While most Arab leaders are not willing to relinquish power, many have an interesting perspective. These leaders are not bound by the traditional millennial priorities. For instance, one Arab leader whose age is now approaching fifty is more concerned with attending conferences and seminars than he is with being seen in front of the cameras.
The history of Arab politics is far more complex than that of modern times. The Arab Spring heralded the dawn of democratic change in Syria, though the Baathist regime suppressed it. Another example is the Egyptian Movement for Change (Kefaya), which launched a popular revolt against the Mubarak regime, establishing democratic reforms and greater civil liberties. The Arab Spring also spawned the Arab Spring.
There is an urgent need for governments to act against corruption in Arab societies. A number of challenges are faced by the youth of these societies, and ensuring that youth participate fully in society is critical to the future of the Arab world. The region will be shaped by the youth of today. They are the future of the region. In the meantime, governments can take positive steps to stem corruption. The Arab Spring has prompted governments and civil society to take positive steps to address these challenges.
The League of Arab States (LAS) is an informal confederation of 22 Arab countries. The League was chartered in response to post-war colonial divisions of territory and the threat of a Jewish state on Palestinian territory. The League has been criticized for its lack of unity and for having autocratic regimes in some countries. A recent scholarly article in the New York Times examines the role of Arab states in international politics.
The relationship between Arab and Western states has changed radically following Russia’s invasion of the Middle East. They recognize that the West is the only way to modernise and regain the trust of their neighbors. In contrast, the West is recalibrating its policies towards the Arab world. The rebalancing of foreign relations will have a profound effect on how these states engage with the rest of the world.
Despite a lack of resources, the policy of the Bahraini government has not led to major unrest. Although the country is rich in oil, it lacks the resources of Saudi Arabia and Qatar and relies on repression to subdue its citizens. The situation is a grim reality for Arab leaders. Their unique perspective and ability to make a difference is what sets them apart from other leaders.
RELATED ARTICLE:AAIF Youth Leadership Scholarship
The Western Arab world is a part of the larger Arab World, which is a vast geographical region covering approximately eight million square kilometers. Some of these countries are monarchies, such as the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain. Others are republics. In general, Arab countries have poor democratic elections. Recent instances of rigged elections include Mauritania and Tunisia. In addition, there are significant restrictions on political and civil liberties.
The Arab League has played a significant role in the Palestinian statehood process at the UN, and it could have been an important diplomatic force during the uprisings in many Arab nations in the early 2010s. The Arab League’s actions during the 2011 Libyan uprising are lauded by some observers, while others criticize the fragmented response to the rise of Islamic State and the Arab Spring.
As a result of this history, Arab leaders have a unique perspective and are capable of governing in the global arena. For instance, Mohamed Bin Zayed made it a point to ensure the education of women, despite the fact that female illiteracy is nearly one hundred percent. He also permitted churches in Abu Dhabi, flouting the common Muslim belief that no other religion should establish itself in the Arabian Peninsula. In addition, American missionaries set up a hospital in Al Ain during the late 1950s. This hospital was where Zayed gave birth to his third son, Mohammed.
Abbas, who is a dentist, has a unique perspective on the Arab-Israeli conflict. He has proposed an eight-point plan to settle the conflict, including a Palestinian state. This plan was widely considered to be the first attempt to find a fair settlement for both sides, and it was unanimously endorsed by the Arab League in 1982. And while this approach has been controversial, it has had many positive effects.
Arab Leaders Are Able to Take Advantage of Opportunities and Build a Better Future
There is a critical question of whether Arab leaders can capitalize on the current situation to create a better future. Will they be able to achieve high growth rates with low unemployment? Will Arab countries be able to avoid civil war? Ultimately, the answer lies in imagination. If Arab leaders are able to take advantage of opportunities and build a better future, the region will be on a more stable path.
One of the biggest obstacles for Arab reform is a lack of political reform ambition. Arab regimes prefer controlled liberalization over political reform. In contrast, most of the 22 Arab countries recognize systemic failures and seek to improve government and economic performance. While this approach may seem risky, it does represent the best chance of Arab leaders being able to make a difference. Taking advantage of opportunities and building a better future requires Arab reform movement leaders to champion the right realities and abide by the same.
The Arab Spring has caused unrest and protests in the region. The core of social contract is effective governance. Yet high unemployment and sluggish regional economic growth add to dissatisfaction. To avoid future Arab revolutions, Arab leaders must improve governance. They must build strong institutions to ensure that their countries can flourish. A good government requires effective governance. Developing a culture of democratic governance is critical.
The United States must make a concerted effort to help Arab reformers build a democratic society. The Obama administration has proposed doubling the budget for the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), a government-funded foundation that supports pro-democracy activism. The State Department is also negotiating a joint statement of reform principles with its European counterparts, which would guide Western engagement with Arab governments.
Despite the challenges faced by Arab states, the UAE has continued to pursue a dynamic foreign policy in the region. In 2011 the UAE intervened in Libya on the side of General Khalifa Haftar, who has been trying to unite the country since 2014. The UAE also enjoys good relations with the United States since the beginning of 2017, sharing a common anti-Iran line. But in mid-2019 the UAE has pursued a cautious Iran policy.
While the United States must trust that its shared interests will mediate tensions between Arab leaders, a more aggressive approach to democratization will inevitably create a more tense situation in the Arab world. However, many in the diplomatic establishment argue that the more aggressive approach to democratization will endanger Arab cooperation. The United States must be able to trust that Arab leaders will use this shared interest to build their countries.
The emergence of an oil-rich region has pushed some Arab states to adopt ambitious plans. Despite the uncertainties surrounding global oil markets, the emergence of ambitious plans has helped Gulf leaders to improve their governments’ performance. Vision 2030 in Saudi Arabia was a key announcement in the region, and it was updated in 2016. The Gulf state government has been struggling with reforms, and its leaders have announced massive spending cuts to convince citizens to accept the cuts.
The UAE is an example of post-Arab Spring authoritarianism. In Egypt and Libya, the UAE has taken a lead role in counter-revolutionary efforts and has established itself as a regional power broker. The UAE has long regarded the Muslim Brotherhood as a threat to their regime’s stability, but in the wake of the Arab Spring, it has allied itself with pro-Western forces and taken stronger action against Islamist groups in the region.
The UAE has boosted its economic and military presence along the Gulf of Aden and Gulf of Oman, thereby establishing a regional presence. In addition, Abu Dhabi is gaining political weight in relation to Riyadh. With these new developments, the UAE has demonstrated that it is committed to a geopolitical vision of co-controlling sea routes around Arabia. And it’s doing it with a clear vision: to build a regional power.
In the region, the Arab Spring is not the catalyst for a new wave of political reforms. Arab leaders must recognize the lessons of history and use them to build a more prosperous future. Even if the Arab Spring is a catalyst, it is unlikely to lead to a radical change. Rather, it is a means to a new chapter in Arab politics. So, we can take stock of the recent changes in the region.
Arab Leadership Must Navigate Through Difficult Political and Economic Environment
To survive and prosper in the Arab world, arab leadership must navigate through a difficult political and economic environment. In a changing world, Arab leaders must learn how to navigate through a difficult political environment. The Arab world has changed considerably since the rise of the first democratically elected Arab leader in 1956. In the wake of the Arab Spring, many of the world’s perceptions of the region have changed.
Regardless of the Arab world’s challenges, there are three lessons to be learned from Tunisia’s upheaval. While Tunisia’s upheaval was not sparked by economic concerns, it was triggered by a lack of good governance. Leaders in the region must understand the vulnerability of their societies and work to improve the political and democratic rights of their populations. This can help prevent future upheavals.
In a recent meeting, Middle East Program scholars discussed regional players in the region and the domestic challenges that the region faces to sustain its influence. The event featured two distinguished scholars from the Woodrow Wilson Center, David Ottaway and Robin Wright, and two Woodrow Institute Fellows. In addition to their research, the scholars discussed the future of the region. During the discussion, participants answered questions from the audience.
The events in Tunisia are a wake-up call to the Arab world. While many of these leaders are still trying to navigate through the turbulent political and economic landscape, their advisors argue that they do not need to emulate Tunisia. The problem with this approach is that it does not address the real lessons learned in Tunisia. In other words, it will return to business as usual in no time, and the consequences will be far reaching.
The draft constitution of Egypt, for instance, is far from perfect. But it contains more rights than previous constitutions. This may help set the tone for key issues in the Arab world. After all, the draft constitution addresses more rights than previous documents. The Arab world will not be as divided and apathetic as it was before. If this constitution is adopted, the Arab world may be headed in the right direction in terms of democracy.
As a result, Egypt must create a minimum of 9.4 million jobs over the next decade. To succeed, it must increase its gross domestic product by ten percent annually. The government must also increase employment opportunities for young people. To reach these goals, Arab leaders must learn how to navigate the political and economic environments. And this is not easy. In the past, the Arab world was unable to do so due to the lack of a viable democratic alternative.
As traditional civilizations continue to evolve into superpowers, so do small states. The lessons of history must be proactively applied in the 21st century. Despite the Arab world’s plight, the UAE has emerged as a regional power. It was a long process that was led by many factors. The Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi has become one of the most prominent and visible Arab leaders in the last decade.
Despite the difficulties of the region, Arab leaders should develop a vision for their future. In doing so, they must respect the distinct characteristics of each State and make sure the funding is flexible and sustainable. In particular, Kuwait is part of the League of Arab States’ regional action plan on implementing resolution 1325 (2000). The plan is designed to accelerate Arab States’ efforts to advance the agenda for women.
The Saudi government imposed an oil embargo after Sadat launched the Arab-Israeli War in 1973. In addition, Saudi Arabia banned the sale of oil to many countries, including the United States, Canada, and the Netherlands. This embargo eventually led to a world oil crisis that was largely attributed to the Arab-Israeli conflict. During the war, the Arab-Israeli embargo lasted for a decade and resulted in the oil price rising nearly 300 percent. It was a major event for many Arabs and Muslims worldwide.
ALSO READ: Define Global Leadership
