Directive leadership is an antithesis to distributed leadership. It is not only antithetical to this style of management, but it also has its benefits. In this article, we’ll examine the pluses and minuses of directive leadership. You’ll learn why this style is rarely used in the business world, and how it can be modified to improve employee performance. But first, let’s examine how it is used in military organizations. Basically, directive leadership is a form of management that follows a strict hierarchy.
Directive Leadership is a Style of Leadership
When a situation calls for a leader to take control of a situation, they choose a style of leadership called Directive Leadership. In this style, the leader assumes full responsibility for the outcome of the situation and sets out a plan for the team. This style often includes implementing strict rules to protect the safety of team members and to ensure that tasks are completed with a high degree of quality. In addition, this style requires the leader to supervise the team’s performance and ensure that they’re following directions.
The primary benefit of directive leadership is its ability to ensure consistency and create stability within an organization. It also provides a simple path for team members to follow, and members feel more confident in the leader’s instructions. It also fosters accountability, as team members are aware that they’ll be monitored and held accountable. Directive leadership makes it easy to set up goals and to track progress, but it requires strict adherence to rules and guidelines.
A leader who follows a directive style should be confident in his or her abilities. They need to be confident in their ability to make decisions and ensure that their team members are doing the right things. For example, they should have strong communication skills and be able to clearly communicate their expectations. Moreover, they must be able to establish their authority from the start. If a leader hesitates in making a decision, their team members won’t trust him or her.
It is a Style of Management
If you have a team and want them to achieve their full potential, you should consider using the directive leadership style. This style is characterized by leaders who make decisions for others and demand that their employees carry out the rules and expectations that they set. Leaders who practice this style of management typically have little interest in the emotional state of their workers or the development of motivational techniques. However, they must be direct and clear with their followers.
A directive leader emphasizes rules and regulations and does not foster innovation or proactive behavior. They believe in a hierarchy and value control over the team. However, this style of leadership can lead to more stress and burnout for employees and may not be the most effective management style. In addition to limiting employees’ ability to take initiative, directive leaders often tend to micromanage their teams. However, it is crucial for leaders to delegate responsibility to their subordinates in certain situations.
A directive leader must be confident in their ability to lead. They must set goals and define clear steps for employees to take. Without clear expectations, workers will be confused and their efforts will fall short. This style of management requires the leader to establish his or her authority early on, otherwise they may become distrustful and unwilling to work hard. If a leader is hesitant, they risk losing valuable staff. It is therefore essential to establish an authority level before implementing any management strategy.
It is Antithetical to Distributed Leadership
While the term “distributed leadership” is often used to describe a more democratic approach to management, it is also a misnomer, since it masks centralized decision-making processes and power differentials. Bolden et al. (2007), for example, conducted fieldwork in the United Kingdom and concluded that distributed leadership is not really an organizational quality, but rather an activity that is a property of social systems.
The best example of a directive leader is a supervisor who gives clear instructions and supervises their team. This type of leadership relies heavily on organization and structure, which ensures that workers know their roles and are held accountable. Directive leaders regularly review expectations with their teams to make sure everyone is following them. However, when the situation calls for more creativity or initiative, the more distributed the leadership style becomes. However, in some organizations, distributed leadership is preferred as it encourages creativity and innovation.
Directive leadership is a common style in military organizations, but is not recommended in the corporate world. The main difference between this style and distributed leadership is that the former is more effective in certain situations than the latter. For example, business leaders who implement a more distributed approach are more responsive to employee feedback than their direct reports. The latter, on the other hand, are more likely to encourage employee feedback. The difference between distributed and directive leadership is the degree of control that each leader has over the organization.
It Has its Pluses and Minuses
While directive leadership is useful for getting things done, it can also cause problems for the morale of a team. People don’t like being told what to do all the time. They’ll lose their sense of loyalty and motivation to succeed. In addition, they’ll feel unappreciated as individuals. If your team feels like a drone, they’ll have less motivation to improve.
Directive leadership relies on clear communication between the leader and followers. Employees need to be able to receive all the information they need to do their jobs. If a leader is disorganized or has trouble communicating, they may benefit from taking a communication course. In addition, it’s important to have procedures in place so that team members know what they’re expected to do. The more clear communication a team has, the more efficient the entire organization will be.
A prime example of a Directive style of leadership is in the teaching profession. Teachers don’t work collaboratively with their students. Their curriculum is rigid and they use a syllabus and rubric to train students. This style of leadership has its pluses and minuses. In some workplaces, it’s beneficial to use a mix of methods to get the best results. For example, in an industry where innovation and creativity are valued, a more participative style of leadership might be more beneficial.
It Can be Effective
Directive leadership is a management style where the leader directs the work of their followers to reach a pre-defined goal. This leadership style is popular among online marketing agencies, where marketing strategies can vary from initiative to initiative and from client to client. It is imperative for the leader to set clear guidelines and train his or her team members according to them. Directive leadership can be an effective style of leadership when it is used properly. But it can also be counterproductive.
For instance, if a group of employees is completing a project, a directive leader is obligated to determine the timeframe and tasks for that work. The leader may also be asked to make decisions that may delay the process. While this style of leadership is sometimes effective, it also tends to limit the effectiveness of the team. This type of leadership style can stifle creativity and can lead to rigidity. However, this style of leadership can be helpful in organizations where there is little room for errors.
A direct leader can guide and inspire employees. The effectiveness of a leader depends on how well they can motivate their workers and create a positive working environment. A study by O’Kane et al. (2006) found that the main purpose of a leader is to inspire, empower, and provide satisfaction to workers. According to Ali (2012), a less capable leader may lead employees the wrong way, affecting the flow of work.
It Can be Assertive
As a leader, it is crucial to reflect qualities of confidence, authority, and boldness. These qualities should come through when you communicate with your employees. Assertive leaders are willing to give constructive feedback and seek out solutions that will increase their performance. While directive leaders may be assertive and direct, they should never attack their employees personally. This approach does not improve the organization and will only lead to low morale. In this article, we’ll look at how a leader can be assertive while still preserving his or her integrity.
The most obvious disadvantage of directive leadership is the lack of adaptability. By limiting employees’ freedom, this type of leadership discourages innovation, creativity, and ingenuity. However, it fosters goal achievement. As a result, it emphasizes unambiguity, clarity, and precision in communication. It also emphasizes specific instructions to ensure that the follower understands the role and responsibilities of the position. It also emphasizes the importance of understanding the incentives for subordinates to do a good job.
In addition to assertiveness, people respond to certain communication styles differently. They may use passive, aggressive, or passive-aggressive communication styles. As a leader, you should note these differences and learn how to effectively communicate. This way, you will be able to avoid common mistakes and make sure to communicate your needs and expectations in a constructive way. And don’t be afraid to use nonverbal cues when communicating with others.
It Can be Passive-Aggressive
Passive-aggressive leadership is a bad idea. It will prevent you from communicating with your staff and can even derail morale. The good news is that passive-aggressive leaders are not always malicious. They may sigh heavily at their employees when they forget to click their pens, or hyper-conform to avoid action. Regardless of their intention, passive-aggressive leaders can have the opposite effect of the positive leadership style.
Passive-aggressive behaviors include rebuffs, backhanded compliments, and sarcasm. A passive-aggressive executive will use indirect communication to make people guess. And there will always be some residual uncertainty in the conversation. This is why it’s important to avoid passive-aggressive leadership whenever possible. In order to avoid passive-aggression, be aware of your body language.
If you suspect that your manager is passive-aggressive, don’t ignore their feelings. Oftentimes, a passive-aggressive leader harbors raw emotions and doesn’t want to hear your criticism. Instead, acknowledge their behavior and try to reach a positive conclusion. If you have trouble dealing with passive-aggressive leaders, set up a one-on-one meeting with them. Make sure they’re listening to your concerns and attempting to find solutions.
ALSO READ: Cobra Wraps Itself Around Child Neck For Two Hours
