The Roets Leadership Scale is a questionnaire that measures four dimensions of leadership. These dimensions include task orientation, leadership self-efficacy, and leadership flexibility. Results of previous research suggest that Asian, Latinx, and weissen women are more likely to become executives than non-minorities. This reflects racial bias in society. The study also revealed that the presence of a mentor is strongly associated with high leadership scores.
This scoring system was developed to assess mentoring and leadership in Black and Latinx communities. The research showed that the presence of a mentor in a girl’s life was positively related to academic achievement, and 1 in three Black teachers reported bias against students of color. Dismantling these barriers, providing leadership development, and building a supportive ecosystem of mentors can help these girls realize their leadership potential. The Roets Leadership Scale is a tool for identifying leaders in girls of color.
The YLPS’s dimensions had significant positive correlations with other assessment tools. For example, the LSI decision-making skill dimension was positively associated with the YLPS’ decision-making skill dimension, and the RRSL leadership self-efficacy dimension was significantly correlated with the YLPS leadership attitude dimension. Although the YLPS was unable to establish a reliable test-retest reliability, the results suggest that the first-order five-dimensional ESEM-within-CFA model fits the data best. Further, the ESEM-within-CFA model enables an interpretation of youth leadership potential.
The ILS is a short, behaviorally focused questionnaire. Its score can be used to assess the extent of EBP implementation leadership in an organization. The ILS results are used to guide leadership development efforts and serve as a developmental tool. A few researchers have found good correlations between ILS and MLQ subscales. Overall, the ILS has excellent psychometric properties. The ILS also has a high sensitivity, indicating that leaders with strong ILS scores are likely to perform behaviors associated with effective implementation of EBP.
Roets Leadership Scale
The Roets Leadership Scale measures the qualities that lead to successful leadership. The scale measures a variety of aspects, including motivation, openness to new experiences, and moral development. A study in Hong Kong found that female secondary school students in Hong Kong had higher self-ratings for traits that lead to effective leadership, including task orientation and energy level. The presence of a mentor was associated with high leadership scores.
The RLS has satisfactory psychometric properties and was cross-validated in a sample of students with and without leadership experience. The scale measures three dimensions of leadership: motivation, leadership attitude, and skills. The psychometric properties of the scale are supported by the data analysis and are consistent with the development theory of leadership. Despite these limitations, the YLPS is an effective tool for measuring leadership potential among youth. The results demonstrate that youth have high potential for becoming a leader.
The ILS was found to have moderate to high correlations with MLQ subscales for transactional and transformational leadership. Correlations ranged from 0.62 to 0.75, indicating that the ILS has convergent validity. This scale is a brief assessment of unit-level leadership, but has promise as a development tool. In addition to its psychometric properties, the RLS also has high internal consistency and good discriminant validity.
The Roets Leadership Scale (RRSL)
The roets leadership scale (LSE) is an assessment of a person’s abilities as a leader. It was developed by Murphy and Feasel in 1992 and has since been validated in several research contexts. The most recent measure is based on Paglis and Green’s 2002 work and was applied in three research environments. In each study, the LSE was interpreted as measuring general leadership capabilities and a student’s confidence to lead.
The RRSL is a self-report scale that measures various aspects of leadership. This instrument includes 15 items that assess self-efficacy, leadership flexibility, and task orientation. Students who complete the RRSL report their levels of self-efficacy in three different areas. The test is highly valid and reliable for measuring leadership among Chinese adolescents. Its convergent validity with other leadership assessment measures is also a positive sign.
In addition to schools, organizations outside of the education system can measure the effectiveness of leadership programs. Non-traditional school programs could include 4-H and FFA programs, local chambers of commerce, and YMCAs. More recently, some public and charter schools have incorporated the LSE into their curriculum. Testing the youth LSE may prove to be an effective way to increase student confidence and broaden the pool of future leaders.
While literature supports the concept of self-efficacy in leaders, this theory has not been fully validated when applied to youth. Until now, there has been little research examining how self-efficacy is affected by leadership, but the roets leadership scale could help fill that gap. This scale will also enable future research into how youth leaders develop self-efficacy, which is an essential factor for effective leadership.
